Talkin’ Chemtrails with Pilot Graham Hood
When people are praying for aircraft to crash into each other, it's time to talk seriously about contrails and what's really going on.
Tonight on Club Grubbery.
Clouds and Chemicals.
This is the final of our interviews and opinions on Geoengineering.
We have saved the best till last as we interview Jim Lee from www.climateviewer.com
Jim presents a well-educated perspective that I can resonate with.
It’s a marathon two-hour show which we were going to present in two parts.
We feel it better for you to watch it all at once or cut into it as your time and interest permit.
Either way, we hope this may clear some things up for you.Stayoutathetrees.
God bless
Hoody and Johnny.
For more information not in this video, watch Graham’s video on March 21, 2024 which explains what led up to our interview. I think you’ll enjoy it.
Follow Graham Hood and John Larker on Club Grubbery
March 29, 2024
March 21, 2024
I just watched this. Excellent. You're clearing some things up for me and helping me be more nuanced. 1hr 7min you describe what you do when you see a plane. I do the same though my camera's not up to your standard. Trained as a chem eng so familiar with much of the actual science (which is complicated enough, no wonder people are losing their minds over this); had a government power company client in Asia who was cloud seeding ~20 yrs ago; can (and have) read jet fuel MSDSs. Your work is by far the best. I was finally convinced actual spraying was occurring here when I took the photo on my Substack hm page.
Of course none of this would be possible without debt based fiat currency, but that's another conversation.
I watched this entire video carefully, having also twice viewed your interview by Del Bigtree.
The rhetorical foundation of your approach is worth repeating here in paraphrase, since I haven't encountered anything like it in public debate -- you reveal it in a few phrases:
"Semantic game"; "slave-speak"; "high level descriptors with a dash of truth thrown in . . . and then twist that . . ." Post hole digging, indeed!
This is the crux of debate with any scientist or podcaster. To step away from this "slave-speak" is to probe, and ultimately prove the hateful sophistry -- and tech -- for what they are, even occasionally forcing their proponents to some semblance of ethical and academic honesty.
I had been a regular viewer of Dane Wiggington's productions for over a year, and had often repeated some of the questionable assertions in "The Dimming" as fact. Though it seems that you and Dane reach the same ultimate conclusion -- that there is widespread atmospheric vandalism presenting an existential threat to humanity -- the angle you present is much more readily imaginable. I feel that the expression "Ockam's razor" is overused, but it characterizes your success.
The account you gave of a three hour conversation with another who made online presentations on "chemtrails", the next day to discover that he had deleted three years of work after hearing your arguments is wonderful. As is that of the scrapping of three hundred of your own articles.
Would that Dane could honestly permit his hard work to undergo the same scrutiny -- I'm sure that there are many elements of his dogged research which are of unquestionable value.
For my part, since I have had nothing more at stake than that of "the-survival-of-everyone-I-know and-also-myself", I can tell you that to leave the arena of "slave-speak" -- even for a few moments here and there -- has been a great philosophical relief.
Had I not had to blow up my career to sidestep "health mandates", I'd send a financial contribution; right now, all I can promise to pay you is my careful attention.