I just watched this. Excellent. You're clearing some things up for me and helping me be more nuanced. 1hr 7min you describe what you do when you see a plane. I do the same though my camera's not up to your standard. Trained as a chem eng so familiar with much of the actual science (which is complicated enough, no wonder people are losing their minds over this); had a government power company client in Asia who was cloud seeding ~20 yrs ago; can (and have) read jet fuel MSDSs. Your work is by far the best. I was finally convinced actual spraying was occurring here when I took the photo on my Substack hm page.
Of course none of this would be possible without debt based fiat currency, but that's another conversation.
I watched this entire video carefully, having also twice viewed your interview by Del Bigtree.
The rhetorical foundation of your approach is worth repeating here in paraphrase, since I haven't encountered anything like it in public debate -- you reveal it in a few phrases:
"Semantic game"; "slave-speak"; "high level descriptors with a dash of truth thrown in . . . and then twist that . . ." Post hole digging, indeed!
This is the crux of debate with any scientist or podcaster. To step away from this "slave-speak" is to probe, and ultimately prove the hateful sophistry -- and tech -- for what they are, even occasionally forcing their proponents to some semblance of ethical and academic honesty.
I had been a regular viewer of Dane Wiggington's productions for over a year, and had often repeated some of the questionable assertions in "The Dimming" as fact. Though it seems that you and Dane reach the same ultimate conclusion -- that there is widespread atmospheric vandalism presenting an existential threat to humanity -- the angle you present is much more readily imaginable. I feel that the expression "Ockam's razor" is overused, but it characterizes your success.
The account you gave of a three hour conversation with another who made online presentations on "chemtrails", the next day to discover that he had deleted three years of work after hearing your arguments is wonderful. As is that of the scrapping of three hundred of your own articles.
Would that Dane could honestly permit his hard work to undergo the same scrutiny -- I'm sure that there are many elements of his dogged research which are of unquestionable value.
For my part, since I have had nothing more at stake than that of "the-survival-of-everyone-I-know and-also-myself", I can tell you that to leave the arena of "slave-speak" -- even for a few moments here and there -- has been a great philosophical relief.
Had I not had to blow up my career to sidestep "health mandates", I'd send a financial contribution; right now, all I can promise to pay you is my careful attention.
"Though it seems that you and Dane reach the same ultimate conclusion -- that there is widespread atmospheric vandalism presenting an existential threat to humanity"
Agreed.
My only hope is that my presentation style is simpler to understand and rooted in facts and that it resonates with people. Unless we can circumvent the verbal ninjitsu played by the scientific ministry of truth, we will never change a thing.
While people argue chemtrail vs contrail, the sky is darkened and we are breathing pollution from an industry that benefits from a semantic war online.
Thank you for being a critical thinker and I appreciate your support and attention.
A few might be offended by your simplicity, but I was happy to see that nearly all of the comments from Highwire viewers were approving of your work.
I suffered through the interruptions of your presentation on "Directed Energy Weapons" with the rest of your audience, and appreciate your emphasis of the threat of China over that of Russia. I had been unaware both of the age and the scope of this "Star Wars" technology. I recall mention of such weapons re: the Lahaina fire, but later came across an article implicating Smart Meters as another form of "directed energy weapon".
I like your style. It *is* straightforward, but sometimes goes off on tangents and loses me. It's not easy communicating to dough brains. We need all the help we can get. I would love a real simple summary: "So the bottom line is..." kind of wrap up, if that's possible.
Digital world digital gods ,singularity with the machine! Depopulation on numerous levels from birth! Brains taken over before you can either speak or see!
Over 24 chemical concoctions shot into your arms, at birth for the environment they destroyed
Nobody thinks of this they just hand over their baby to be poisoned!
Then guess what you need more! Boosters, Digital shots And a mask and house arrest!
American dream and the Israel experiment dance hand in hand!
Praying to their digital Gods!
While Jesus died a criminals death!
Who is the only one offering a way out, at least thru Jesus you can reclaim your brain! keep your soul!
Before they kill you! Everybody needs to man up! You are all going to Die!
You might live in a godless sim! But Jesus will have the last say!
The shipping industry has been under attack and comprised since it went digital, like everything else! Less sailors onboard because it’s computerized!
They can control the engines and the steering!
Purposely they left the back door open, they always do!
Know your enemies see the light! Death is not the end get over it!
The enemy is the digital world! Prince of the airwaves! Satan himself!
Your poetry is pretty good; when the rhythm is faint, it makes up with true assertions; I had presumed English to be nearly a dead language.
RFK Jr has observed that there is "a fate worse than death", presumably referring to the digital enslavement of a depopulated world.
I find consolation in Christ. His first appearance was in the context of a worldwide census, his return in that of clever fools hacking at the Tree of Life. It appears that none of the ruling elite are any good at math. And they have poor taste.
This was really great. I'm learning more here and I'm grateful for that. One part I don't get: the spraying sulfur to cool the planet (if I got that right) so they can continue to ignore CO2. I've learned the science is clear that the sun and cosmic rays are the main driver of global temperatures. I'm sure they know that too, so why go through all the trouble? What gives?
Thank you Jim Lee for your integrity and dedication to truth. I have been struggling with reconciling the evidence before me and the current narrative regarding this issue. There is open talk from the parasite class about geoengineering, there are official documents about it, there is legislation in place covering it, I see white skies instead of blue, etc. but the analyses provided eg. from Dane Wiggington have never sat right with me. I think I had my head poked down a couple of dead end rabbit holes with this and you have pulled me back out. Thank you.
I asked the question in the Telegram Climate viewer chat, why do I see suds in the water of the bay of Lake Superior that I live on? And it stretches out as far as I can see. I was told it was jet engine fuel emulsifiers. I would like to know what an emulsifier is and also, why have I only seen the suds in the last five years when the chem trails started here. (and I know they are not passenger planes...I checked the flight tracker you recommended; they don't show up)
I just watched this. Excellent. You're clearing some things up for me and helping me be more nuanced. 1hr 7min you describe what you do when you see a plane. I do the same though my camera's not up to your standard. Trained as a chem eng so familiar with much of the actual science (which is complicated enough, no wonder people are losing their minds over this); had a government power company client in Asia who was cloud seeding ~20 yrs ago; can (and have) read jet fuel MSDSs. Your work is by far the best. I was finally convinced actual spraying was occurring here when I took the photo on my Substack hm page.
Of course none of this would be possible without debt based fiat currency, but that's another conversation.
I watched this entire video carefully, having also twice viewed your interview by Del Bigtree.
The rhetorical foundation of your approach is worth repeating here in paraphrase, since I haven't encountered anything like it in public debate -- you reveal it in a few phrases:
"Semantic game"; "slave-speak"; "high level descriptors with a dash of truth thrown in . . . and then twist that . . ." Post hole digging, indeed!
This is the crux of debate with any scientist or podcaster. To step away from this "slave-speak" is to probe, and ultimately prove the hateful sophistry -- and tech -- for what they are, even occasionally forcing their proponents to some semblance of ethical and academic honesty.
I had been a regular viewer of Dane Wiggington's productions for over a year, and had often repeated some of the questionable assertions in "The Dimming" as fact. Though it seems that you and Dane reach the same ultimate conclusion -- that there is widespread atmospheric vandalism presenting an existential threat to humanity -- the angle you present is much more readily imaginable. I feel that the expression "Ockam's razor" is overused, but it characterizes your success.
The account you gave of a three hour conversation with another who made online presentations on "chemtrails", the next day to discover that he had deleted three years of work after hearing your arguments is wonderful. As is that of the scrapping of three hundred of your own articles.
Would that Dane could honestly permit his hard work to undergo the same scrutiny -- I'm sure that there are many elements of his dogged research which are of unquestionable value.
For my part, since I have had nothing more at stake than that of "the-survival-of-everyone-I-know and-also-myself", I can tell you that to leave the arena of "slave-speak" -- even for a few moments here and there -- has been a great philosophical relief.
Had I not had to blow up my career to sidestep "health mandates", I'd send a financial contribution; right now, all I can promise to pay you is my careful attention.
"Though it seems that you and Dane reach the same ultimate conclusion -- that there is widespread atmospheric vandalism presenting an existential threat to humanity"
Agreed.
My only hope is that my presentation style is simpler to understand and rooted in facts and that it resonates with people. Unless we can circumvent the verbal ninjitsu played by the scientific ministry of truth, we will never change a thing.
While people argue chemtrail vs contrail, the sky is darkened and we are breathing pollution from an industry that benefits from a semantic war online.
Thank you for being a critical thinker and I appreciate your support and attention.
A few might be offended by your simplicity, but I was happy to see that nearly all of the comments from Highwire viewers were approving of your work.
I suffered through the interruptions of your presentation on "Directed Energy Weapons" with the rest of your audience, and appreciate your emphasis of the threat of China over that of Russia. I had been unaware both of the age and the scope of this "Star Wars" technology. I recall mention of such weapons re: the Lahaina fire, but later came across an article implicating Smart Meters as another form of "directed energy weapon".
I like your style. It *is* straightforward, but sometimes goes off on tangents and loses me. It's not easy communicating to dough brains. We need all the help we can get. I would love a real simple summary: "So the bottom line is..." kind of wrap up, if that's possible.
Digital world digital gods ,singularity with the machine! Depopulation on numerous levels from birth! Brains taken over before you can either speak or see!
Over 24 chemical concoctions shot into your arms, at birth for the environment they destroyed
Nobody thinks of this they just hand over their baby to be poisoned!
Then guess what you need more! Boosters, Digital shots And a mask and house arrest!
American dream and the Israel experiment dance hand in hand!
Praying to their digital Gods!
While Jesus died a criminals death!
Who is the only one offering a way out, at least thru Jesus you can reclaim your brain! keep your soul!
Before they kill you! Everybody needs to man up! You are all going to Die!
You might live in a godless sim! But Jesus will have the last say!
The shipping industry has been under attack and comprised since it went digital, like everything else! Less sailors onboard because it’s computerized!
They can control the engines and the steering!
Purposely they left the back door open, they always do!
Know your enemies see the light! Death is not the end get over it!
The enemy is the digital world! Prince of the airwaves! Satan himself!
Your poetry is pretty good; when the rhythm is faint, it makes up with true assertions; I had presumed English to be nearly a dead language.
RFK Jr has observed that there is "a fate worse than death", presumably referring to the digital enslavement of a depopulated world.
I find consolation in Christ. His first appearance was in the context of a worldwide census, his return in that of clever fools hacking at the Tree of Life. It appears that none of the ruling elite are any good at math. And they have poor taste.
Jesus wants you to go the distance !
Go the distance! He knows nobody is perfect, no man is righteous not one
But go the distance! Show your love! Until your flesh life ends!
Times will convince many to do other wise!
Go the distance! Brother!
"His return"
Apologies for the typo.
This was really great. I'm learning more here and I'm grateful for that. One part I don't get: the spraying sulfur to cool the planet (if I got that right) so they can continue to ignore CO2. I've learned the science is clear that the sun and cosmic rays are the main driver of global temperatures. I'm sure they know that too, so why go through all the trouble? What gives?
Thank you Jim Lee for your integrity and dedication to truth. I have been struggling with reconciling the evidence before me and the current narrative regarding this issue. There is open talk from the parasite class about geoengineering, there are official documents about it, there is legislation in place covering it, I see white skies instead of blue, etc. but the analyses provided eg. from Dane Wiggington have never sat right with me. I think I had my head poked down a couple of dead end rabbit holes with this and you have pulled me back out. Thank you.
I asked the question in the Telegram Climate viewer chat, why do I see suds in the water of the bay of Lake Superior that I live on? And it stretches out as far as I can see. I was told it was jet engine fuel emulsifiers. I would like to know what an emulsifier is and also, why have I only seen the suds in the last five years when the chem trails started here. (and I know they are not passenger planes...I checked the flight tracker you recommended; they don't show up)